JASON BK AN, cca m.arch thesis 2013-2014

#summerisserious

SCENARIO3 Los Angeles: Interaction Infrastructure

1111 Lincoln Road, Herzog & de Meuron

1111 Lincoln Road, Herzog & de Meuron

Currently, the Mega-Infrastructure of Los Angeles is relentless, unyielding, inflexible, and static. The cars that take up the super highways crawl from exit to exit and, in a sense, do all of the work.

Freeways are also always a means to an end. But it seems to me that with so much money, resources, and space committed, we can dig deeper into what kind of impact they can have on our lives rather than just the singular goal of getting from point A to point B.

Can accessibility become program? Can programs facilitate accessibility? Does accessibility even have to be all that important with the injection of program?

There isn’t a lot of information out there regarding these ideas, but Herzog & de Meuron’s 1111 Lincoln Road parking structure comes closest. It is a mix-use parking structure facilitated by shifting, scaling, and deforming structures typically found in a typical parking structure. Each floor is landscaped, insinuating that each floor can act as the ground plane no matter how high above the ground they actually are.

The Great Divide

The Great Divide

We are already surrounded by cars. How can we co-exist with them more fluidly? Freeways are seen as scars and agents of separation. How do we change that?

Pershing Square

Pershing Square

Universal City Walk

Universal City Walk

This made me think of the idea of public space. Public space is continuously being redefined as the areas we typically think are public spaces become commercialized and lose their democracy. Pershing Square is a carefully manicured landscape that is empty aside from a couple hours during lunch. City Walk is a collage of spectacles with overpriced restaurants and movie theaters.

Exhibition Road, London

Exhibition Road, London

Exhibition Road, London

Exhibition Road, London

It’s evident that we should start to rethink what public space is. There needs to be a delicate balance of accessibility, deliberate programs, and impromptu events. I think that freeways have the potential to be the last frontier of proper public space. Accessibility to LA freeways is not an issue. All you need is a car which in LA is not a limiting factor, as about 85% of households in LA have a car. Every one on the freeway has more or less equal “ownership” of area, the footprint of their cars. There are laws that apply to every car that evens the playing field in terms of mobility regardless of class and the level of automobile available for them.

Exhibition Road in London approaches this concept, transforming the busy, half-mile road into a clutter-free shared street with cars, pedestrians, and cyclists attentively navigating through the space without the need for an excessive amount of street signs and traffic signals. Transportation is reprogrammed into something that requires constant active and passive interaction with the people around you. It turns out that giving people more freedom and democracy in their public space actually helps, reducing traffic by 30% and decreasing the number of accidents.

Freeway and Dead Space

Freeway and Dead Space

Freeway and Dead Space

Freeway and Dead Space

In light of the concepts of fringe-to-core and dense sprawl, programming infrastructure can take lessons from the dense, diverse, and accessible core. As the core is being squeezed by the fringe, can the core expand or relieve itself within programmed infrastructure? Could this movement into infrastructure take pressure off dense sprawl areas, allowing for more breathing room for the positive aspects of density and sprawl to emerge while eliminating the negative aspects? Can infrastructure programs flood over onto surface level streets, possibly dead spaces, to help mitigate the scarring and segregating effects of Mega-Infrastructure?

Resources:

 
 
 
 
Advertisements

2 comments on “SCENARIO3 Los Angeles: Interaction Infrastructure

  1. Pingback: SCENARIO4 Los Angeles: Utopian Fantasy | JASON BK AN

  2. Pingback: SYNTHESIS2: Interactive Swarm Core | JASON BK AN, cca m.arch thesis 2013-2014

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Information

This entry was posted on July 17, 2013 by and tagged , , .
%d bloggers like this: